.....

 

 

>> 1996 Issues
>> 1997 Issues
>> 1998 Issues
>> 1999 Issues
>> 2000 Issues
>> 2001 Issues
>> 2002 Issues
>> 2003 Issues
>> 2004 Issues






Subscribe to CVM's newsletter

Please subscribe me

Please unsubscribe me

 

Enter your e-mail address

 



 




August 2001 Volume 2.08



The Benefits of CVA (Part Four)
by Rodger Gallagher

Knowing why customers don't buy from us, is just as important as knowing why customers buy from us.

Customers buy our products when they believe that we are supplying products and service with the high quality attributes, which they require. An earlier article covered how econometric modelling allowed us to work out with elasticities what factors drive purchasing, and the degree to which each of these value drivers impacts purchasing. The elasticities are usually converted into impact weights, which are easier to work with.




In the survey we will have asked customers to rate our performance on all of the various value drivers and the overall key purchase criteria for each service delivery area where there is an interaction with customers. By considering performance information along with the impact weights we can determine if customers believe we are performing well on the criteria that matter most to them. High impact and high performance indicates a criteria strongly influencing customer purchasing behaviour.
In the above example, if customers rated us 8.5 out of 10 on Excellence for our Customer Service people being Interested And Helpful, and the Impact Weight was 66%, then we would know that this was an important driver of why customers purchase from us. We could reinforce this strength with a marketing campaign.

Why customers don't buy from us

Conversely if our customers indicate through the ratings that our performance on a particular purchase criteria, is only fair (4 to 5 out of 10), and the modelling tells us that this purchase criteria has a high impact on purchasing, then we have found a reason why customers don't buy from us. If in the above Customer Services example, our customers had only rated us 5.5 out of 10 for Interested And Helpful, but the Impact Weight was still 66% then we have found one reason why customers might not be buying from us. When customers give us a rating of 5.5 out of 10 they are telling us that our performance on this purchase criteria is only just satisfactory. If we were any worse we would have failed on this criteria. We need to investigate what is the underlying cause of why our customers rate us so low on Interested And Helpful. Is there a shortage of people to answer phones in our call centre? Are we measuring and rewarding the Customer Services people for keeping all conversation with customers under 300 seconds in length?

Once we know the cause, we then need to decide if this is an area where we need to improve. It may be that we are performing so well in some other area of product & service delivery, that we do not need to be Interested And Helpful. Or perhaps our company's value proposition is based on providing basic service and selling products at a low price. If this is the case we may not be overly concerned that our Customer Services people are not Interested And Helpful. But if our value proposition is based around customer service then we need to find a cost effective way to improve performance on Interested And Helpful.

When customers don't buy from us because the competition is better than us

What if our performance on a particular purchase criteria, is satisfactory or good (6 to 7 out of 10), but our competition's performance is also good? Many businesses regard a satisfactory product or service as good enough. A Web search with the Google search engine found 532,000 companies offering a 100% satisfaction guarantee. Is this very basic level of service good enough?

Looking once more at our customer services example, consider the case when our performance for Interested And Helpful on is 6.5 and our competition's performance is 6.9. In the CVA approach, the way used to track performance relative to the competition is to compare our performance relative to the competition with a ratio. We divide our absolute performance by the competition's absolute performance and multiply the result by 100. So our relative performance for Interested And Helpful is:

100 X 6.5 (Our Performance) = 94
6.9 (Competition's Performance)

If we had been equal to the competition, the result would have been 100 or parity. If we had been better than the competition then our relative result would have been over a 100. Clearly with a relative result of 94 our performance is inferior to the competitions. And with the Impact Weight for Interested And Helpful at 66%, we have revealed another reason why customers why customer don't buy from us. So there are degrees of satisfaction. Even though a customer is 100% satisfied with your products, services and price it doesn't mean that they will be loyal. The only thing that counts in the customer's eyes is when you are better than the competition.

So here we have another three benefits coming from the information provided by the CVA approach:
* Knowing why customers buy from you.
* Knowing why customers don't buy from you.
* Knowing why customers buy from the competition instead of you.

A New Zealand Pub

Perhaps the phrase New Zealand pub is an oxymoron. A year or so ago I got excited that perhaps the Clyde Tavern in Hamilton East had the right mix of regulars to sort of qualify as a pub. Hamilton readers of CVM Update told me I was wrong and the publican at the Clyde changed, service went down hill and customers stayed away. So my quest for the New Zealand pub continues. There is a Web site that claims to list New Zealand pubs www.nzpubs.com, but it is only a list of all New Zealand bars, taverns and hotels. The statement is made that the local pub is a kiwi icon - you could have fooled me! In many New Zealand towns night life centres around the licensed club rather than a pub. Books have been published on the subject of New Zealand pub. The most recent one, called Pubs of New Zealand by Malcolm Somerville, is well presented with a good write up and great photos on many of the old hotels along New Zealand's main roads. The Rangiriri tavern on the way from Hamilton to Auckland is included. I've stopped there a few times, and this seems to qualify as pub. There are locals enjoying themselves or perhaps huddled in a corner having a meeting of a local club.
But one pub that isn't covered in the book is the Harbour View at Raglan. Opened in 1866, records indicate that the publican George Moon had a Bush license with unrestricted opening hours. The present striking colonial style building was built in 1903, after the original one was damaged by fire. While the bush disappeared from Raglan long ago, the locals still congregate in the bars with hosts Jeff and Kerry Holloway, amongst the walls covered with historical artefacts such as the giant snapper caught many years ago and the song sheet for 'Raglan by the Sea'. The Raglan Sport Fishing Club provides community involvement with its meetings at the hotel. A good range of food is available ranging from Café style in the Sports bar to extensive meals in the Verandah bar. The staff is friendly and ready to help with suggestions. One of my favourites is Lamb Shanks on a bed of Kumara assisted with a bottle of the local lager - Raglan Gold.

Regards,


Rodger Gallagher

 

© CVM 2002 : | Home | What is CVM? | Products | Resources | Update | Associates | Bookstore | Contact